Plan an autonomous experimental campaign by translating a research goal and constraints into a concrete experiment set, selecting a design strategy, and defining the design–make–test–analyze (DMTA) loop with clear stop criteria, orchestrating Paramus DOE and planning tools.When to use: a user wants to set up a closed-loop experimental campaign.Multi-tool WORKFLOW with experimental-strategy judgment.
Paramus — Experiment Campaign Planner
Overview
Turn a research goal into a runnable closed-loop campaign: choose the design strategy, define the DMTA loop, and set stop criteria. The value is the campaign-level strategy, not any single design call.
Guidance vs execution: designs and optimization come from tested Paramus tools; execution dispatches to OPERATE / lab robots. Do not hand-generate run matrices in ad-hoc code.
When to Use
- Setting up an autonomous / closed-loop experimental campaign
- "How should I structure experiments to reach this goal within budget?" Do not use for: one-off analysis of an existing dataset (use the analysis workflow).
Workflow
Goal + factors + ranges + budget + constraints
↓ 1. Formalize objective & constraints → measurable target + limits
↓ 2. Select design/strategy → screening → optimization → active learning
↓ 3. Generate initial design → Paramus DOE tool
↓ 4. Define DMTA loop → make → test → analyze → decide
↓ 5. Set stop criteria → convergence / budget / confidence
↓ 6. Emit campaign plan → runnable plan + provenance
Procedure
- Discover tools via
search/get_schema("design of experiments", "optimization", "campaign"). - Formalize the objective into a measurable target with explicit constraints.
- Choose the strategy (screening vs RSM vs active learning) and justify it.
- Generate the initial design; echo factor coding and randomization.
- Define the DMTA loop and how results feed the next iteration.
- Set stop criteria and emit the campaign plan with provenance.
Domain Judgment
- Match strategy to budget: don't propose RSM when only a screening budget exists.
- Always define stop criteria up front — an open-ended loop is a runaway cost.
- Separate simulate-in-the-loop steps from wet-lab steps; state which is which.
Fallbacks
- Planning/DOE tool unavailable → deliver a manual design + loop description, clearly scoped.
- Endpoint unreachable → stop and report; do not fabricate a run matrix in local code.
Tools this skill may use
Candidate deterministic tools an agent is likely to route to when running this skill. The skill decides which to call at runtime.
-
Project Tracker Create Project
OtherCreate a new science project. Auto-creates an empty budget record. -
Project Tracker Create Series
OtherCreate an experiment series under a project. -
Project Tracker Create Milestone
OtherCreate a milestone for a project. -
Brain HPC Bofire Doe
Data ScienceGenerate experimental design -
Full Factorial
Data ScienceGenerate full factorial design with customizable levels for each factor
Browse the full deterministic layer in the tool browser.
Used in these use cases
Customer scenarios that orchestrate this skill end-to-end.